As planned, I’m going to try to say a few words on the cotangent complex in the following posts. There is a bit of background I’d like to go through first, starting with the theory of simplicial sets. The reason is that the cotangent complex is most naturally thought of using the model structure on simplicial rings, on which it is a non-abelian version of a derived functor.
1.1. The simplex category
Definition 1 Let
be the category of finite (nonempty) ordered sets and order-preserving morphisms. The object
will denote the set
with the usual ordering. Thus
is equivalent to the subcategory consisting of the
. This is called the simplex category.
There is a functor from to the category
of topological spaces. Given
, we send it to the standard topological
-simplex
that consists of points
such that each
and
. Given a morphism
of ordered sets, we define
by sending
Here the empty sum is to be regarded as zero.
1.2. Simplicial sets
Definition 2 A simplicial set
is a contravariant functor from
to the category of sets. In other words, it is a presheaf on the simplex category. A morphism of simplicial sets is a natural transformation of functors. The class of simplicial sets thus becomes a category
. Asimplicial object in a category
is a contravariant functor
.
We have just seen that the category is equivalent to the subcategory consisting of the
. As a result, a simplicial set
is given by specifying sets
for each
, together with maps
for each map in
. The set
is called the set of
-simplices of
. (more…)