May 24, 2012

The homology of MU

Posted by Akhil Mathew under algebra, topology | Tags: , , , |
[2] Comments 

Finally, it’s time to try to understand the computation of the cobordism ring {\pi_* MU}. This will be the first step in understanding Quillen’s theorem, that the formal group law associated to {MU} is the universal one. We will compute {\pi_* MU} using the Adams spectral sequence.

In this post, I’ll set up what we need for the Adams spectral sequence, which is a little bit of algebraic computation. In the next post, I’ll describe the actual calculation of the spectral sequence, which will complete the description of \pi_* MU.

1. The homology of {MU}

The starting point for all this is, of course, the homology {H_*(MU)}, which is a ring since {MU} is a ring spectrum. (In the past, I had written reduced homology {\widetilde{H}_*(MU)} for spectra, but I will omit it now; recall that for a space {X}, we have {\widetilde{H}_*(X) = H_*(\Sigma^\infty X)}.)

Anyway, let’s actually do something more general: let {E} be a complex-oriented spectrum (which gives rise to a homology theory). We will compute {E_*(MU) = \pi_* E \wedge MU}.

Proposition 1 {E_*(MU) = \pi_* E [b_1, b_2,\dots]} where each {b_i} has degree {2i}.

The proof of this will be analogous to the computation of {H_* (MO; \mathbb{Z}/2)}. In fact, the idea is essentially that, by the Thom isomorphism theorem,

\displaystyle E_*(MU) = E_*(BU) \simeq \pi_* E [b_1, \dots, ]

where the last equality is because {E} is complex-oriented, and consequently the {E}-homology of {BU} looks like the ordinary homology of it. (more…)

 

November 16, 2011

The Steenrod algebra and its dual

Posted by Akhil Mathew under topology | Tags: , , , , |
Leave a Comment 

I’ve been reading Milnor’s paper “The Steenrod algebra and its dual,” and want to talk a little about it today. The starting point of this story is the theory of cohomology operations. Given a cohomology theory {h^*} on spaces (or just CW complexes; one can always Kan extend to all spaces), one can consider cohomology operations on {h^*}. Most interesting for our purposes are the stable cohomology operations.

A stable cohomology operation of degree {k} will be a collection of homomorphisms {h^m(X) \rightarrow h^{m+k}(X)} for each {m}, which are natural in the space {X}, and which commute with the suspension isomorphisms. If we think of {h^*} as represented by a spectrum {E}, so that {h^*(X) = [X, E]} is a representable functor (in the stable homotopy category), then a stable cohomology operation comes from a homotopy class of maps {E \rightarrow E} of degree {k}.

A stable cohomology operation is additive, because it comes from a spectrum map, and the stable homotopy category is additive. Moreover, the set of all stable cohomology operations becomes a graded ring under composition. It is equivalently the graded ring {[E, E]}.

The case where {E} is an Eilenberg-MacLane spectrum, and {h^*} ordinary cohomology, is itself pretty interesting. First off, one has to work in finite characteristic—in characteristic zero, there are no nontrivial stable cohomology operations. In fact, the only (possibly unstable) natural transformations {H^*(\cdot, \mathbb{Q}) \rightarrow H^*(\cdot, \mathbb{Q})} come from taking iterated cup products because {H^*(K(\mathbb{Q}, n))} can be computed, via the spectral sequence, to be a free graded-commutative algebra over {\mathbb{Q}} generated by the universal element. These aren’t stable, so the only stable one has to be zero. So we will work with coefficients {\mathbb{Z}/p} for {p} a prime.

Here the algebra of stable cohomology operations is known and has been known since the 1950’s; it’s called the Steenrod algebra {\mathcal{A}^*}. In fact, all unstablecohomology operations are themselves known. Let me state the result for {p=2}.

Steenrod had constructed squaring operations

\displaystyle \mathrm{Sq}^i: H^*(\cdot, \mathbb{Z}/2) \rightarrow H^{* +i}(\mathbb{Z}/2) .

These are natural transformations, which have the following properties:

  1. {\mathrm{Sq}^0} is the identity operation.
  2. {\mathrm{Sq}^i} on a cohomology class {x} of dimension {n} vanishes for {i > n}. For {i = n}, {\mathrm{Sq}^i} acts by the cup square on {x}.
  3. The Steenrod squares behave well with respect to the cohomology cross (and thus cup) product: {\mathrm{Sq}^i(a \times b) = \sum_{j + k = i} \mathrm{Sq}^j a \times \mathrm{Sq}^k b}.
  4. {\mathrm{Sq}^1} is the Bockstein connecting homomorphism associated to the short exact sequence {0 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}/2 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}/4 \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}/2 \rightarrow 0}.
  5. {\mathrm{Sq}^i} commutes with suspension (and thus is a homomorphism). (more…)