Flatness and the local and infinitesimal criteria

Flatness is all about avoiding an annoying property of the tensor product: it does not preserve submodules.

Fix a commutative ring . We say that an -module is flat if the functor , is exact; it is always right-exact. It is sufficient to show that for any injection 

 

the tensored sequence is exact, i.e. 

 

It is immediate that the direct sum or tensor product of flat modules is flat, and that a direct summand in a flat module is flat. Also, the module itself is clearly flat. So any free module is flat, and thus so is any projective module.   In the local case, we’ll see that the converse is true at least if we stick to finitely generated modules over a noetherian ring (more generally, for finitely presented modules over any ring). 

Since completion preserves exactness, is a flat -module where is an -adic completion of for noetherian. Localization does to, so any localization is flat.   So many common examples are flat.  But because of the above injectivity characterization, a nonzerodivisor in must act by a nonzerodivisor on any flat module.  Thus for instance, is not flat over . 

 

Generic freeness I

There is a useful fact in algebraic geometry that if you have a coherent sheaf over a Noetherian integral scheme, then it is locally free on some dense open subset. That is the content of today’s post, although I will use the language of commutative algebra than that of schemes (except at the end), to keep the presentation as elementary as possible. The goal is to get the generic freeness in a restricted case. Later, I’ll discuss the full “generic freeness” lemma of Grothendieck.

Noetherian Rings and Modules

All rings are assumed commutative in this post.

As I have already mentioned, a ring is Noetherian if each ideal of is finitely generated. Similarly, a module is Noetherian if every submodule is finitely generated. I will summarize the basic facts below briefly.