There is another version of Zariski’s main theorem, intermediate between the baby one and the hard quasi-finite one. It basically is the big Zariski theorem but for quasi-finite and quasi-projective morphisms. The main point of the argument is a careful application of Stein factorization, discussed yesterday; I’d like to discuss that here. What one eventually has to see is that the quasi-projective hypothesis can be dropped, but this takes some work.
As before, let be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes. We are now interested in the question of when some
is isolated in the fiber
.
Proposition 9 If
is proper, then the set of
isolated in their fiber
is open.
To see this, we shall use the Stein factorization. As before, we can write
where is finite and
has connected fibers. The fibers of
are discrete, and
. The connected component of
in
is thus
. We thus find that
is isolated in its fiber if and only if
. So we may look at the corresponding set for
; it suffices to prove the theorem for
.
That is, we may prove the proposition under the assumption that the fibers are all connected, and furthermore that the pushforward of the structure sheaf is the structure sheaf (since that is true of ). Let us now drop the notation
, and assume that
itself has connected fibers and satisfies
.
We need to show that the set of such that
is open. If there is such an
, I claim that
. This follows because as
becomes a small neighborhood of
, then
becomes a small neighborhood of
as
is closed. Thus, since
, we find that the natural map
is an isomorphism. However, this means that there are small neighborhoods of
which are isomorphic under
. By choosing
small, we can just take
. It follows then that every point in
is isolated in its fiber. This proves the result.
In fact, we have shown more:
Proposition 10 Let
be a proper morphism of noetherian schemes satisfying
. Then if
is the set of
which are isolated in their fibers,
is an open immersion.
Indeed, we have seen that as defined above is an open set in the proof of the previous proposition. We actually saw more, though, in the proof: if
, then there are neighborhoods
of
and
of
, with
, such that
is an isomorphism. If we take the inverse
, and do the same for every such pair
that occurs around any
, then the various inverses
have to glue.
Finally, we can state the second version of the Zariski theorem.
Theorem 11 (Zariski) Let
be a quasiprojective morphism of noetherian schemes. Let
be the subset of
consisting of points which are isolated in their fibers. Then
factors as a composite of an open immersion and a finite morphism.
To see this, first note that by definition of quasiprojective, factors as a composite of an open immersion and a projective morphism. Consequently we can just assume
is projective. In this case, we have the Stein factorization
where
is finite. But on the set of points which are isolated in their fibers, the above corollary shows that
is actually an open immersion. So we find
is the requisite factorization. We can also prove:
Theorem 12 A proper, quasi-finite morphism
of noetherian schemes is finite.
Now it turns out that a quasi-finite morphism is in fact quasi-projective, but this is very nontrivial. We are not yet in a position to prove this.
However, we can at least appeal to the Stein factorization theorem to get where
is finite and
is an open immersion, since every point is isolated in its fiber. However,
is proper, and
is separated, so by the cancellation property, we find that
is itself proper. This means that it must be a closed immersion as well, and consequently finite. It follows that
is finite.
Leave a Reply