We further continue the discussion of topological entropy. Here, we discuss various results that bound above and below the entropy of a given map.
1. The topological entropy of Lipschitz maps
Many of the dynamical systems of interest are actually given by compact manifolds and smooth maps
. These are always Lipschitz with respect to appropriate metrics. Indeed, choose a Riemannian metric on
and let
denote the induced norm on the tangent spaces. Then
is a Lipschitz constant for
with respect to the metric on
induced by the Riemannian metric. In this case, the entropy is always finite. We shall prove this in a more general context.
Let be a compact metric space, and for
, let
denote the the number of
-balls necessary to cover
(which is always finite). Then we call
the ball dimension of . For instance, an
-cube has ball dimension
. It follows more generally that a Riemannian
-manifold has ball dimension
.
The reason we shall use this concept below is that gives an upper bound for a minimal
-spanning set of the space
. (Recall that an
-spanning set means that every point is
-close to it.) In fact, if the
-balls
cover
, then the centers of these form an
-spanning set.
Theorem 1 Let
be a compact metric space with finite ball dimension
. Suppose
is a Lipschitz continuous mapping with constant
, i.e.
for all
. Then the entropy of
is finite and
The idea of this proof is simple. We can evidently assume (if this is not already the case, take
very close to 1 and let
). Then we need to consider the metric
and consider minimal
-spanning sets with respect to this metric. However,
.
Now consider , the minimal cover of
by
balls (with respect to the original metric
). Then any point of
is
close to one of the centers of these balls (with metric
). The previous remark implies that any point of
is
-close with the metric
. In particular, the minimal
-spanning set of
has cardinality at most
. Call this
, as before; then
Now, by definition, is of the order
. Plugging this into the last expression gives that
Letting , we get on the left side the topological entropy. This establishes the bound.
Given the remarks made earlier about the ball dimension of a manifold and Lipschitzness of smooth maps, it follows that:
Corollary 2 Let
be a compact Riemannian manifold of dimension
,
a smooth map. Then
2. The topological entropy of maps of the circle
We now consider a special (but important) low-dimensional case, namely that where the ground space is the unit circle . It is well-known from elementary algebraic topology that the homotopy classes of maps
are in bijection with the integers, i.e. that the fundamental group of
is the integers. In this way, we can associate to each continuous
an invariant, called its degree, which turns multiplicativity to composition. For instance, the map
has degree
.
It is possible, as we now show, to connect this with topological entropy.
Theorem 3 Let
be continuous and of degree
. Then
.
The idea of the proof is simple–it’s basically to reverse the Lipschitz argument above. We shall use the following mini-lemma : Let be continuous and suppose we can decompose
into arcs
such that the image
of each arc
has length at most
. Then
has degree
. The reason is as follows. Lift
to a map
such that
. Then on the pull-back of each arc
in the interval
,
can jump by at most 1 because
is contained in a semicircle.
Now, let’s prove the theorem. Suppose . Pick
between the two numbers. Then for
large, the smallest
-spanning subset of
with respect to
has cardinality at most
. Call this set
. These points are contained in small arcs
that cover
and such that
has length at most
. This is because we can take
to be the
-neighborhood of
in the metric
. It now follows by the previous mini-lemma that the degree of
is at most
. But the degree is multiplicative and must therefore be
. This contradiction establishes the result.
I don’t think I’m going to actually prove it, but I’ll mention another (significantly deeper) version of this idea. First, recall that if is an oriented
-manifold and
continuous, then the top singular cohomology group
is one-dimensional, and the associated map
is called the degree of . In the smooth case, which is what we care about, we can construct this (in view of the isomorphism between de Rham and singular cohomology) by taking an
-form
whose integral is nonzero and considering
this is the degree.
The following is the theorem that I will state without proof:
Theorem 4 Let
be a smooth map of an oriented compact,
-dimensional manifold
. Then we have
.
For a proof, I refer you to Chapter 8 of Katok-Hassselblatt’s Introduction to the Modern Theory of Dynamical Systems, which is my primary source for this material.
Leave a Reply