I talked about the Lie algebra a while back. Now I’m going to do it more properly, and using the tools developed. This is going to feature prominently in some of the proofs in the sequel.

Now, let’s see how all this works for the familiar case of , with its usual generators . This is a simple Lie algebra in fact. To see this, let’s consider the ideal of generated by some nonzero vector ; I claim it is all of .

Consider the three cases :

First, assume or is nonzero. Bracketing with , and again, gives

Using a vanderMonde invertibility of this system of linear equations, we find that either or belongs to . Say does, for definiteness; then too; from this, as well. Thus .

If , then from , we find , which implies and similarly for . Thus .

I claim now that the algebra is in fact a Cartan subalgebra. Indeed, it is easily checked to be maximal abelian. Moreover, since acts by a diagonalizable operator on the faithful representation on , it follows that is (abstractly) semisimple.

So given a finite-dimensional representation of , we have

where is the -eigenspace for , and ranges over the complex numbers! We are now interested in looking at finite-dimensional irreducible representations . In particular, will have a highest weight , which in this case is just a largest eigenvalue, and a corresponding eigenvector . Then , .

**Proposition 1** *, and the lowest weight in is . *

To see this, we shall prove three commutation relations on , the enveloping algebra.

The first two follow because (resp. ) and bracketing by is a derivation on the algebra .

The third follows by a somewhat tedious inductive argument. It is obvious for . Assume it for . Consider

because bracketing is a derivation. Now simplifying this using the inductive hypothesis yields:

Simplifying futher gives:

So, if we define , then we see that satisfies the recurrence relation

which is also satisfied by the other term at the end of the third identity.

Now, we can prove the proposition. As above, was the highest weight and a vector with weight . Then by the Poincare-Birkhoff-Witt basis theorem, the family

is a basis. Therefore since is annihilated by ,

spans a sub--module of , which is all of by simplicity. Note that is a weight vector of weight ; for large it follows that .

Let be the largest value such that . I claim now that .

First of all, we have

Now, in view of the third identity:

and since , it follows that

In particular, is a positive integer and !

### Like this:

Like Loading...

*Related*

February 4, 2010 at 7:19 pm

[…] Climbing Mount Bourbaki Thoughts on mathematics « Interlude on sl2 […]