Fix a Riemannian manifold with metric and Levi-Civita connection
. Then we can talk about geodesics on
with respect to
. We can also talk about the length of a piecewise smooth curve
as
Our main goal today is:
Theorem 1 Given
, there is a neighborhood
containing
such that geodesics from
to every point of
exist and also such that given a path
inside
from
to
, we have
![]()
with equality holding if and only if
is a reparametrization of
.
In other words, geodesics are locally path-minimizing. Not necessarily globally–a great circle is a geodesic on a sphere with the Riemannian metric coming from the embedding in , but it need not be the shortest path between two points.
To prove this will require a bit of work. Here is a warm-up lemma we shall need.
Lemma 2
Letbe a curve, and
vector fields along
. Then
![]()
To prove this, write where the
are parallel and orthonormal at
(hence along
). Then
while
by the rules for connections. Then the statement of the lemma becomes merely the product rule.
A corollary of this lemma is that geodesics have constant speed
.
Now we move on to proving the theorem. First of all, let’s choose such that it is the diffeomorphic image of the unit ball
under the exponential map
; this is because the exponential map’s differential at zero is the identity. Then every path
as above can be written in the form
, where
and
(with the norm on
coming from the inner product
). Now this is a geodesic up to reparametrization iff
is constant.
We have
Motivated by this, consider the map where
is a small interval containing the origin, with
Lemma 3 (Gauss) We have
.
Let trace out a path in
which is also a 1-dimensional closed submanifold with tangent vector
at
. Now
is a function of
, which is
evaluated at . So it will be enough to prove that the vector field
along the surface
vanishes. Take the partial derivative
with respect to
, using the first lemma:
The first term vanishes by definition of a geodesic—the image of a line in with a fixed point of
gets sent via
to a geodesic. As for the second, we can use the Clairaut-like theorem for symmetric connections to get that this equals
Now in here we can pull out the to get
(Recall that geodesics move at constant speed .) Going back a few equations to (2) shows that
is constant in
. Since
for all
because of the term
(all geodesics start at
!), we find that
. This implies the lemma.
With notation as in (1), we have by the Gauss lemma
This will be minimized precisely when , which is when
is a geodesic.
Leave a Reply